Alpha Capital Risk Review + Promo Code COMPARE50 / COMPARE

Quick answer: Leaving Alpha Capital's Focused Trader Group requires a discretionary review. The purchase date determines whether one or two successful performance fees are needed and whether approval concerns one account or the whole profile. An on-demand account also needs 30 calendar days of trading data. Reaching a profit figure alone does not restore normal status.

Verified codes: COMPARE50 gives 50% off a first purchase; COMPARE gives 30% off later purchases. The active Alpha Capital offer details the coupon terms. Use one eligible code without stacking.

Official rules and regular prices checked: 8 October 2026. This guide concerns review readiness on CFD Qualified Analyst accounts.

Start with the purchase-date branch

The Focused Trader Group policy draws the line at 21 July 2026:

The account must have no open positions and normally be at its original starting balance; Alpha One is exempt from that balance condition. On-demand requires at least 30 calendar days of qualified trading data. A denied payout for a rule violation breaks the older-account consecutive sequence. Biweekly payouts do not satisfy the separate Focused Trader On-Demand removal requirement. The firm asks traders to request review through its Risk team and allows up to 48 hours for a response.

Save the purchase invoice first. A qualification date, first trade date and purchase date can all differ. Labelling them separately avoids assigning an older purchase to the newer review branch merely because it qualified later.

Build a review record with evidence

A useful record should let another person check eligibility without guessing which account a screenshot belongs to. This is an organizational suggestion, rather than an additional firm rule.

Keep complete statements alongside a short summary. A screenshot of two cash receipts may omit a rejected request between them; a platform balance may omit which account generated the profit. The summary helps navigation, while the underlying evidence supports it.

A date-based example

Consider an invented account purchased on 20 July and qualified in August. Its successful payout records are A and C, with a rule-related rejection B between them. A worksheet should preserve all three events in order. Removing B because it paid no cash would hide information relevant to the review sequence.

For a separate account bought on 22 July, a successful payout after 18 calendar days of on-demand qualified trading data does not complete the 30-day data condition. Do not confuse a payment milestone with a time-series requirement or count evaluation days simply because they appear in the same journal.

These examples identify missing evidence. They do not recommend taking extra trades or targeting profits to secure a status change.

A review request does not change trading permissions

Alpha Capital's terms describe reduced exposure, risk restrictions and temporary payout-choice restrictions within the group. Continue using the actual account's limits while a request is pending. A sent email, an elapsed response window or a positive balance is not an approval notice.

Separate the administrative states in your record: preparing evidence, request sent, response received, approved scope confirmed and dashboard settings reconciled. This prevents a calendar reminder from being treated as permission to change execution settings.

The standard Pro 6% specification gives ordinary plan limits, including 6% targets in each phase, 3% daily loss and 6% static maximum loss. Those general specifications help identify the product, but a trader under additional restrictions must also read the account-specific notice.

After approval, compare the decision with the displayed account settings. If they disagree, ask the firm to reconcile them before relying on a restored limit. Save the response rather than inferring the answer from another trader's experience.

Keep scaling and purchase decisions separate

The official scaling policy has its own performance-fee and retained-growth requirements. Restored status alone does not prove scaling eligibility. Our scaling request guide explains that later decision.

Similarly, a discounted new evaluation is a purchase with its own risk of failure. Treating another purchase as an administrative shortcut obscures the unresolved review and adds a separate cost. First establish what the existing notice and decision actually cover.

Alpha Pro prices with the correct purchase code

The official live catalog, checked on 8 October, lists these published Pro 6% on-demand base fees. They are evaluation prices, not fees for removal from the group.

First-purchase pricing is regular fee × 0.50; later-purchase pricing is regular fee × 0.70. Optional upgrades, taxes and payment or conversion charges are additional. No add-on discount is assumed.

Apply the correct code

1. Choose the model, size, platform and available payout package.
2. Enter COMPARE50 for a first purchase or COMPARE for a later one.
3. Apply one code and check the base fee separately from extras.
4. Review the full order and selected terms before payment.

The Alpha Capital review provides broader account context.

Compare Futures Prop may earn a commission through offer links. Alpha Capital uses simulated funds; nominal balances are not withdrawable deposits. Program fees can be lost, and neither review approval nor performance fees are guaranteed. Examples explain records and rules, not expected trading returns.