Atlas Funded Forex 2-Step vs Pro + Promo Code COMPARE

Atlas Funded Forex 2-Step is cheaper and has the larger published total-loss allowance. 2-Step Pro charges a little more for lower evaluation targets, no separate daily loss limit and no evaluation minimum days. With verified promo code COMPARE for 50% off, the $50K base fees calculate to $120 for 2-Step and $128.50 for 2-Step Pro.

That $8.50 difference is easy to compare. The harder question is whether a 10% total-loss allowance with a daily limit fits your trading better than an 8% total-loss allowance without that separate daily cap. The choice should follow a record of your strategy's losses and trading frequency.

Verified code: COMPARE. Facts and prices checked 9 October 2026. This comparison covers Atlas Funded Forex accounts only.

Affiliate disclosure: CompareFuturesProp may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through its partner links.

All 2-Step and 2-Step Pro prices after COMPARE

These regular fees come from the current official Forex selector and its published pricing data. The table covers one account, with no optional add-ons. Each saving and final base fee equals 50% of the regular amount.

Amounts are USD. Do not apply COMPARE on top of an already reduced public-sale figure. Add-ons, resets, bundle offers, taxes, conversion and payment costs are outside this table unless checkout explicitly confirms their treatment. Check the accepted code and total before payment. See the Atlas Funded Forex coupon offer for redemption details.

At $5K and $10K, the calculated Pro premium is $4.50. At $25K, $50K, $100K and $200K, it is $8.50. That small fee difference does not make the two risk models interchangeable.

How to apply COMPARE to either 2-Step model

1. Open the Atlas Funded Forex offer and follow the official Forex purchase link.
2. Choose 2-Step or 2-Step Pro, then the account size and available platform. Review optional extras separately.
3. Enter COMPARE in the coupon field and apply it. Do not include the discount percentage in the code.
4. Confirm the accepted 50% base-fee reduction and the complete payable total. Use the selected model's regular fee as the comparison, without stacking another promotion.
5. Read the applicable account rules and refund policy before paying, and retain the order confirmation with the accepted code and plan details.

Compare the rules before comparing account labels

The current 2-Step help and 2-Step Pro help publish the following base conditions.

For a $50K account, the ordinary phase targets are $4,000 and $2,500. Pro's are $3,500 and $2,000. Phase two starts as a fresh phase at the same nominal size. Adding the two targets into a single balance forecast would give the wrong picture of progress.

The corresponding initial maximum-loss floors are $45,000 and $46,000. Pro therefore gives up $1,000 of initial loss room on that size in exchange for its other changes. The $8.50 higher purchase fee buys a different rule set; it does not buy more trading capital or a wider safety margin.

What removing the daily limit actually changes

A separate daily limit can stop a trading day before the total-loss floor is reached. A trader whose normal losing session stays well within the daily limit may gain little from removing it. A trader whose strategy produces concentrated sessions may value the flexibility, but the smaller Pro total-loss budget still needs to accommodate those sessions.

Use a sample of your own completed trades to compare both versions. Record the largest daily loss, worst overall decline, longest inactive period and number of days with closed trades. Apply the limits to those observations without assuming that every future loss will resemble the average.

For ordinary 2-Step, the help's $50K example starts a day at $51,000 equity and places the daily floor at $48,500. The $2,500 daily allowance is based on starting account size, while the day's reference equity affects its location. Check both the daily and overall floors before opening positions.

Pro's absence of a daily limit does not remove funded risk controls. Atlas Protector checks open losses against 2% of initial balance. Its first trigger closes positions and permanently reduces the split to 50%; a second trigger breaches. That is relevant even when the ordinary daily-limit field says none.

A funded-day example can change the decision

The trading-day guide counts Forex days in UTC and uses net closed results. On ordinary $50K 2-Step, a qualifying funded day needs at least $250. Pro counts a day with a closed trade, while still requiring the account's overall payout conditions to be satisfied.

Consider an illustrative five-day record of +$320, +$180, -$90, +$275 and +$210. The net profit is $895. Only two days reach the ordinary model's $250 qualifying threshold. A profitable week does not automatically complete its five-day requirement.

Under the current Pro day definition, all five days contain closed activity, including the losing day. That does not turn the losing trade into a benefit or guarantee a reward. It simply shows why the shape of returns can matter more than a headline profit total when comparing programs.

The example is a rule calculation, not a forecast or suggested profit target. Increasing risk just to make a day count can undermine the very loss controls the trader is trying to satisfy.

Check the floor again after a withdrawal

The drawdown guide distinguishes the two programs after payout. Pro retains the floor derived from the original starting balance. Ordinary 2-Step is included in the programs whose reference balance can be re-anchored after payout.

For a hypothetical ordinary $50K account left at $51,000 after a withdrawal, a 10% recalculation produces a $45,900 floor. The original $45,000 figure should no longer be assumed. For the $50K Pro example, the stated original floor remains $46,000.

Keep the post-payout balance and actual displayed floor in your journal. Withdrawal arithmetic and account-survival arithmetic are linked, even where the term static appears in both product descriptions.

Official-source differences to settle

Both detailed program pages show a 90% default split and a 14-day first and recurring payout cycle. The general terms instead give an 80% default and a different default cycle. Marketing also makes broader payout and fee-return claims. Obtain account-specific written confirmation rather than combining the best figures from different pages.

The fee-return help describes the discounted base fee returning as Atlas Balance after the third consecutive paid payout. That is purchase credit, and other official refund wording differs. Keep it separate from an assumed cash rebate when comparing the two account fees.

Funded news windows, short-trade deductions and margin protections can affect eligible profit on either route. A numerical consistency rule being absent does not waive those conditions.

Choosing between the two

Start with three questions: does your strategy fit within the ordinary daily limit; does it need the extra 2% total-loss allowance; and how frequently does it produce the ordinary model's qualifying funded days? Then compare the relevant final purchase fees.

Use the Atlas Funded Forex review for the other account routes and broader restrictions. A lower target or coupon can reduce one obstacle, but neither establishes that the account suits a strategy. All balances are simulated, and the full purchase fee should be affordable to lose.