Sure Leverage Funding Allocation Caps + Discount Code AUDIT

Sure Leverage Funding publishes two overlapping funding ceilings: $400,000 overall and $200,000 across Instant Funding. Unlimited evaluation accounts do not create unlimited funded capacity. Track the combined amounts before buying or progressing another account. Official General Rules.

Verified code: AUDIT gives 42% off plus 10% extra payout split. The purchase reduction and extra-share benefit are separate components of the Sure Leverage Funding offer. Neither increases an allocation ceiling. Official sources checked 10 October 2026.

Use two totals in the account register

Record total funded allocation in one column and the Instant subset in another. An Instant account contributes to both totals. A funded evaluation-route account contributes to the overall total, with its model and status recorded separately.

The general rules give an allowed example of $200K from 1-Step or 2-Step plus $200K from Instant. They reject combining $200K of one Instant label with another $200K Instant label. The $400K headline therefore cannot be treated as a separate allowance for each product family.

Build the register from original account sizes and confirmed program status, rather than daily profit or a platform's current equity display. If a product's naming has changed, ask support how it maps to the allocation category. Do not assign it to a more favorable category merely because the name differs from an older help article.

Worked combinations show which ceiling binds

The following examples illustrate arithmetic under the two published ceilings. They assume no stricter personal or country condition, and do not establish that every product combination will be approved.

The second row is the common trap. It leaves $50K below the headline overall ceiling but exceeds the separate Instant allowance by $50K. Unused room in one calculation cannot be transferred into the other.

In the third row, adding another $25K evaluation-derived funded account would produce $425K overall even though the Instant subtotal stays unchanged. Both calculations must be repeated after any addition.

Passing an evaluation can create a future capacity problem

Suppose a trader already has $200K of confirmed funded allocation and $150K of Instant allocation, a $350K combined total. A separate $100K evaluation is still in progress. The trader currently fits the headline arithmetic, but funding the additional account would raise the combined total to $450K.

The sensible planning step is to ask how that pending transition would be handled before relying on it. The public page does not specify a universal queueing, replacement or temporary-overlap procedure. Do not assume an evaluation can be activated later indefinitely, or that an account automatically stops counting after a payout.

Add a “potential next funded total” field to the register. It does not claim that an evaluation will pass; it makes the consequence visible if it does. This avoids a surprise when several evaluations progress around the same time.

Apply stricter eligibility limits first

The general rules separately state a $50,000 total funding limit for Malaysia and publish other restricted-country conditions. The headline totals cannot override a stricter applicable limit. The same source says there is no current scaling plan and describes the accounts as simulated. Eligibility and allocation policy.

For an illustrative trader subject to a $50K total limit, two $25K accounts already use the stated capacity. A third $5K account would make $55K. The fact that $55K is far below $400K is irrelevant to that narrower condition.

Check eligibility through the official process. Do not spread accounts across other identities to alter the calculation or conceal ownership.

Keep closures, resets and payout events distinct

A payout, reset and account closure are different events. The public allocation passage does not explain every counting transition. Ask when an account stops consuming capacity and retain the written answer with the affected account identifier.

Keep inactive-looking accounts on the register until their actual status is confirmed. A missing platform tile or an old email is weak evidence that an account has been removed from a funding total. Record closure confirmation separately from the date the account was last traded.

If you change platforms or product versions, preserve the link between old and replacement identifiers. Otherwise a personal spreadsheet can accidentally count one account twice or omit an account that still exists.

Budget purchases only after the capacity check

This allocation guide does not quote a newly verified size-specific purchase price. The public product listing inspected showed a range without a reliable selected-size fee. For an eligible new order, select the precise model and platform on the official site, apply AUDIT, and inspect the 42% fee reduction plus the separate extra-share terms.

For a confirmed regular fee F, the base calculation is F × 0.58. Verify the actual share, duration and any ceiling of the payout benefit instead of combining the promotion into a 52% fee discount.

The firm review covers wider program differences. The BNPL handover guide addresses another transition cost. Compare Futures Prop may earn affiliate commission; fees can be lost and neither available capacity nor a coupon guarantees funding or rewards.