Sure Leverage Funding News Windows + Discount Code AUDIT

Quick answer: Sure Leverage Funding's 1-Step evaluation allows red-news entries and exits, but its funded account prohibits opening or closing within five minutes before or after a red-folder event. Instant and EA models need their own rule checks; evaluation permission is not universal. Verified code AUDIT offers 42% off eligible purchase fees plus a separate 10% extra payout-split benefit. A $70 1-Step $5K base fee calculates to $40.60, saving $29.40.

Code: AUDIT

Official rules and regular prices reviewed 11 October 2026. The current offer supplies the verified coupon terms. Confirm the extra share's resulting percentage, coverage and duration separately; it is not an additional purchase discount.

Match the news policy to the model and stage

The 1-Step rulebook expressly separates evaluation permission from funded restrictions. A strategy can therefore comply during its evaluation yet need different execution timing after passing.

Other model pages contain different wording and version qualifications:

Sources: Instant Static, Instant Zero and EA Challenge.

The published effective date does not explain every older purchase's treatment. Keep the account version, purchase date and applicable agreement together. If a saved rule differs from today's help page, ask which governs that account before relying on either interpretation.

Convert an event time into an execution plan

Suppose an illustrative release is scheduled for 13:30 in the calendar's displayed time zone. Subtracting and adding five minutes gives 13:25 and 13:35. These are arithmetic examples, not an actual economic-event schedule or a promise that execution at either exact endpoint is safe.

Leave operational margin rather than aiming for the last permissible second. A click at 13:24:59 and a fill recorded later are different timestamps. Preserve the actual execution time when reviewing a trade; a local reminder's timestamp cannot substitute for it.

Opening early also does not establish permission for a later close inside the window on 1-Step funded. Treat the planned entry and exit as separate actions when reviewing an event session. A trade originally unrelated to news can still have an exit whose timing needs attention.

Resolve the rules that the public pages leave unclear

The reviewed model pages do not establish a single binding calendar provider or a complete affected-instrument map. Do not assume that a release matters only to a currency-matched pair, or that a personal calendar's color classification is authoritative.

Pending orders, partial closes and automatic stop-loss or take-profit execution also need a clear account-specific answer. The presence of a protective order is not evidence that its execution is exempt. Equally, the documentation does not justify inventing a separate universal rule for every order type.

Holding an existing position throughout the interval is another distinct question. 1-Step explicitly discusses opening and closing, while some instant-model language is less precise. Obtain confirmation for the exact model instead of importing a hold-through exception from another firm's policy.

A concise support question identifies the account and stage, event, instrument and proposed order behavior. For example, asking how an already-working protective exit is treated is more useful than asking only whether news trading is allowed. Retain the firm's answer with the account terms. Do not remove protection merely to avoid a classification question.

Older account documentation needs its own label

The help center currently puts 2-Step and Instant Trailing in its retired-account collection. Both rule pages now contain the five-minute restriction, with 29 September 2026 wording. The 2-Step page has a funded-stage preamble.

This classification is useful for an existing account, but does not independently establish whether every public checkout route is open or closed. Match legacy accounts to their supplied agreement, and confirm new-purchase availability separately. A product remaining in an old price table is not enough to infer that its historical permissions still apply.

Entry cost remains separate from event restrictions

The current official account selector supplies these regular base fees. The table applies AUDIT once, without stacking the website's separate promotion.

These calculated one-time base fees exclude add-ons, taxes, conversion and separately billed services. No renewal or reset discount is established here. The extra payout-split benefit does not waive news rules, remove review deductions or automatically produce a 100% share.

1. Select the account model, size and platform on the official site.
2. Read its current stage-specific rules and confirm disputed news details.
3. Enter AUDIT and apply the code.
4. Check the 42% base-fee reduction and complete total.
5. Save the receipt and separate extra-share terms before relying on them.

Review the event routine before the first funded trade

Replay several previous event sessions against the funded restrictions. Identify entries and exits that would have fallen inside the window, along with orders whose behavior remains unclear. This exercise tests whether the operating routine fits; it does not predict future profit.

The model pages describe deduction of profits from violating trades during payout review. An apparently successful trade is therefore not proof of reward eligibility. For the separate accounting consequences, use the Zero payout-adjustment guide. The 1-Step EOD guide explains its independent loss and consistency conditions.

The firm overview provides wider context, but current model terms should govern disputed permissions. These are simulated programs, purchase fees can be lost, and neither a discount nor an event checklist guarantees funding or payment.

Affiliate disclosure: Compare Futures Prop may earn commission through links or codes.