Compare Futures Prop logoCompareFuturesProp

Blog / account guides / Traders Launch Standard 60-Day Deadline + Coupon Code COMPARE

Back To Blog
account guides

Traders Launch Standard 60-Day Deadline + Coupon Code COMPARE

OCT 4

2026

Yash R
Traders Launch Standard 60-Day Deadline + Coupon Code COMPARE
Exclusive Coupon
Traders Launch

Traders Launch

Get 30% Off

Get 30% Off

Claim Offer See offer details

Quick answer: Traders Launch Standard $100K has a 60-day evaluation window. Its current FAQ adds a free 30-day extension when an unfinished account is above 50% of its profit target at day 60. On the $2,000 target, that means above $1,000. The 80% profit-split version costs $159 once, or a calculated $111.30 with COMPARE at 30% off.

Reviewed 4 October 2026, in USD. The three-trading-day minimum, weekly activity requirement and 60-day deadline are separate clocks. This guide explains how they interact with the evaluation's 40% best-day rule rather than encouraging a rushed three-day attempt.

Current purchase fee and what the coupon changes

The official Standard account cards list these 80% split versions. The active COMPARE offer supplies the 30% purchase rate.

Plan and profit splitSizeRegular one-time feeCodeRateSavingCalculated final fee
Standard Futures, 80%$100K$159.00COMPARE30%$47.70$111.30
Standard Futures, 80%$200K$299.00COMPARE30%$89.70$209.30
Standard Futures, 80%$300K$599.00COMPARE30%$179.70$419.30

These are single-code calculations from regular fees, not a second reduction on the site's separate public sale. The $100K calculation is $159 × 0.70. A different split, Legacy NYC or Early Access is a different product selection. This article's timeline follows Standard, not an assumption that every new release has the same time limits.

The firm advertises no monthly evaluation subscription and no activation or ongoing funded fee for Standard. A one-time charge does not mean an unlimited evaluation period. See the fee-type explainer for that distinction.

Three clocks to record on day one

The official evaluation rules list a three-trading-day minimum, 60-day maximum and at least one trade per week. The expanded homepage FAQ adds the extension details and explains the inactivity consequences.

ClockStandard requirementJournal entry
Minimum participationAt least three trading daysRecord actual trading sessions completed
Ongoing activityAt least one trade per weekRecord the last trade and next activity deadline
Evaluation window60 days, with a conditional 30-day extensionRecord the dashboard's expiry and extension status

Do not convert “60 days” into “60 sessions.” Weekends, exchange closures and missed sessions can all reduce the number of practical opportunities within a calendar period. Use the platform's displayed deadline rather than guessing whether the start date is counted inclusively.

A reader who can trade only twice a week has a different schedule from one who trades each weekday, even though both buy the same account. A useful plan begins with actual availability. It should not assume an opportunity appears every day or require taking a poor setup to meet a spreadsheet profit schedule.

The free extension threshold is strictly above halfway

The current homepage FAQ says an unfinished evaluation above 50% of its target at day 60 automatically receives an extra 30 days at no cost. For the initial Standard $100K target, the comparison is against $1,000 profit.

Profit shown at the day-60 assessmentShare of $2,000 targetWhat the stated extension wording supports
$95047.5%Not above halfway
$1,00050%Equality is not “above 50%”
$1,05052.5%Above the published halfway threshold
$1,60080%Above the published halfway threshold

These examples isolate the extension calculation. They do not imply that a breached or inactive account is restored by being above halfway, or that the extension overrides any other condition. Confirm the expiry shown in the dashboard after an extension is granted. The reviewed FAQ describes one 30-day extension, not an indefinite series of extensions.

A trader at $1,020 before the last session has only $20 over the halfway reference. A $35 net loss would reduce profit to $985. That illustrates why a balance check from several days earlier cannot establish the final extension result. Commissions and adjustments should be included in the account's actual net figures.

Why weekly inactivity needs its own reminder

The current FAQ says missing a week during evaluation deactivates the account. It distinguishes the funded outcome: inactivity pauses SimFunded, with profits and payout access retained subject to reactivation. Do not assume the more forgiving funded description applies to an evaluation.

Before travel or a busy work period, compare planned availability with the activity rule. An extension of the evaluation deadline does not erase the weekly requirement. Equally, placing one trade a week does not automatically extend the 60-day clock.

Keep this reminder separate from a profit goal. If maintaining activity would require trading when the trader cannot monitor the account or follow the strategy, the sensible response is to resolve the account's options with support rather than assume a token trade is harmless.

The 40% rule also has an automatic session control

The current expanded FAQ says no single evaluation day can exceed 40% of total profit at evaluation end. It additionally describes automatic position closure and a lockout for the remainder of the session when the system is about to reach its limit. The public rules do not publish every implementation detail of that real-time trigger.

Consequently, do not rely on a hand-built spreadsheet to predict the exact second a position will be closed. The final best-day ratio and the platform's live session control are related checks, but they are not interchangeable promises about executable trade size or additional intraday profit.

A final-result example

Suppose three days produce $650, $700 and $650 net profit. Total profit is $2,000 and the largest day is $700, giving 35%. The target and plain consistency calculation line up, subject to the remaining rules.

A different record of $1,000, $600 and $400 also totals $2,000, but the largest day contributes 50%. With the best day unchanged, $2,500 total profit would produce a 40% ratio. This second ledger explains the final formula only; it is not a forecast that the platform would permit that $1,000 session before its automatic control acted.

Extra time does not increase the loss allowance

Standard $100K has a $1,000 EOD maximum drawdown and a $2,000 evaluation target. Its floor trails based on EOD performance and locks at the starting balance under the published rules. The free extension changes time, not those amounts.

For an illustrative account with $100,250 equity and an already locked $100,000 floor, the remaining distance is $250. A fresh 30-day window does not create a new $1,000 cushion. The drawdown-budget guide explains why remaining room matters more than the account label.

A weekly review that stays useful near expiry

Record the current expiry date, last trading date, net profit, largest winning day and active loss floor. Then ask three separate questions: is the account still active, is the target reachable under the current consistency record, and does the present balance satisfy the extension threshold if the original deadline arrives first?

This review should reduce surprises, not create pressure to recover losses. Passing an evaluation and receiving payouts remain uncertain. The official rules state that evaluation and funded accounts operate in a simulated environment and that payout conditions continue after passing.

How to apply COMPARE

  1. Select Standard Futures and the 80% split on the official website.
  2. Choose $100K to match the $159 regular fee in this guide.
  3. Enter COMPARE before payment and inspect the 30% reduction.
  4. Confirm the calculated $111.30 covered fee, selected platform and full order total.
  5. Save the account terms and record its actual start and expiry dates.

For broader context, read the Traders Launch firm page, the existing three-day evaluation framework, and the Standard versus Legacy cost comparison. The central lesson here is that extra calendar time, minimum trading days and weekly activity each solve a different problem.

Traders LaunchStandard 100Kevaluation deadlineconsistencyCOMPARE

Frequently Asked Questions

The 80% split version is listed at $159 once. COMPARE at 30% off calculates to $111.30, saving $47.70.

The current homepage FAQ says an unfinished evaluation above 50% of its profit target at day 60 automatically receives a free 30-day extension. On Standard 100K, above halfway means profit above $1,000.

The FAQ says above 50%, not at least 50%. Exactly $1,000 is 50% of the $2,000 target, so the article does not promise an extension at equality.

No. The evaluation has a 60-day window, with the specified conditional extension. A one-time fee describes billing, not an unlimited deadline.

The current homepage FAQ says missing a week of required trading deactivates the evaluation. Its funded-account pause description is different.

The Standard funded rules state no funded consistency rule. The 40% best-day condition and described automatic session control concern evaluation.

Prop Firms Mentioned

Subscribe For The Latest
In Prop Trading News And Deals