Funded Futures Family Scalping Tests + Discount Code COMPARE

Quick answer: Funded Futures Family’s micro-scalping policy uses two tests: more than half of trades and more than half of total profits must come from positions held longer than ten seconds. Passing the trade-count test alone is insufficient.

Verified code: COMPARE. Save 80% on Velocity, 40% on the first five Premier uses then 30%, and 30% on Prime. See the current Funded Futures Family offer for the purchase scope.

Code: COMPARE

Facts checked: 6 October 2026. Prices are USD. This site may earn a commission from referred purchases. Evaluation fees buy access to a trading program; passing and payouts are not guaranteed.

Understand the two measurements

The official micro-scalping policy applies in evaluation and funded stages. It permits monitored short-duration trading, but requires both duration-based majorities. It also prohibits bots, algorithms and strategies that cannot be reliably executed in live conditions. Potential consequences include payout denial, profit reversion or account closure.

The examples below are our arithmetic illustrations, not firm-issued compliance approvals. They deliberately use simple profitable trades so the distinction between the two tests is clear. The policy does not fully define every calculation edge case, such as partial exits, commissions or a negative net-profit denominator.

A trade-count majority can hide a profit shortfall

Suppose ten completed positions produce the following simplified record:

The longer-held group represents 60% of trades but only 30% of the profits. These are different fractions with different denominators. The first calculation is 6 divided by 10; the second is $300 divided by $1,000. A worksheet that reports only average holding time would not reveal this difference.

The example is not a recommendation to add trades or hold a losing position merely to change a ratio. The purpose is to test whether a trading approach fits the rules before paying for a program.

Profit majority can hide a count shortfall

Now reverse the distribution: four longer-held trades generate $800 and six short-duration trades generate $200. The profit share is 80%, while the count share is 40%. Strong performance in one column does not fix the other column.

Exactly half is also different from more than half. For planning, avoid treating a result at the boundary as a comfortable margin. A corrected fill or a different treatment of a partial close could change a calculation close to a cutoff. Resolve how the firm defines those records rather than inventing your own favorable grouping.

Use a trade export that preserves the evidence

A useful private record includes instrument, entry timestamp, exit timestamp, duration, quantity, fees, realized result and account identifier. Keep original exports alongside any calculations. If the platform groups multiple fills into one position, record that fact so a support question can be specific.

Do not combine several accounts into one favorable ratio unless the firm explicitly confirms that approach. An account-level review should remain understandable from that account’s records. Likewise, do not erase losing trades or select only a profitable week to make a worksheet look compliant.

Questions worth resolving include whether a partial close creates another counted trade, how commissions affect the profit measure and what review period is used. The short public policy does not settle those details. Asking with an anonymized example is more useful than asking whether a strategy is simply “allowed.”

Pick the account structure separately

The Funded Futures Family review covers the program lineup. The Velocity, Premier and Prime comparison explains how evaluation and payout structures differ. Neither a fast evaluation nor an absence of a particular consistency rule removes the separate micro-scalping policy.

For a concrete fee reference, the official Prime page publishes Included and Prime Max options. The following table uses Included base fees and the 30% Prime discount only:

The maximum 80% headline belongs to Velocity, not Prime. These calculations exclude upgrades, resets, tax and later renewal assumptions. For the $50K row, $179 × 0.70 gives $125.30. The account size describes the program’s nominal balance, not money deposited into a personal brokerage account.

Prime’s evaluation and funded payout conditions are separate from the duration tests. The Prime payout-buffer guide addresses withdrawal balance requirements. Keeping those calculations separate makes it easier to spot what is actually preventing a request.

Apply COMPARE with the right plan rate

1. Choose the program and account size.
2. Identify whether the order is a base evaluation or includes optional extras.
3. Enter COMPARE before payment.
4. Use the plan-specific rate, including Premier’s first-five-use restriction.
5. Keep the invoice and selected rules.
6. Review a representative trade record before starting the purchased account.

A lower fee cannot make an incompatible strategy compliant. The useful outcome of this guide is a clear two-column review: the duration-qualified share of trades and the duration-qualified share of profit, with unresolved definitions raised before relying on a result.