Funded Futures Family Prime Payout Buffer + Promo Code COMPARE

Quick answer: Funded Futures Family Prime $50K retains a $52,100 buffer, requires three qualifying $200-profit days, a $500 cycle-profit goal and 40% consistency. The first payout cap is $2,000; later caps are $2,500. COMPARE's Prime rate is 30%, making the $179 Included evaluation's initial payment a calculated $125.30.

Reviewed 4 October 2026. Dollar amounts are USD. The worked ledgers below show why a positive cycle, completed day count and large account balance can still produce different withdrawal limits. They are hypothetical account records, not an earnings forecast.

Purchase price: Included versus Prime Max

The official Prime plan guide currently publishes $179 per month for $50K Included and $204 for Prime Max. Its fee table carries an August specification date and September review date; those are the official regular fees still displayed during this review. The active COMPARE offer assigns 30% to Prime, rather than the 80% headline that belongs to Velocity.

The $17.50 post-code difference buys a different position-limit configuration. It does not lower the payout buffer or remove consistency. The calculation concerns the initial evaluation payment; continuing discounts on renewals, resets and add-ons are not established by this offer. There is no separate passing activation fee in the current plan guide.

Build a payout ledger with five independent checks

The Prime payout-requirements document gives the account-specific buffer, cycle goal, day condition and payout caps. The dedicated consistency guide says the ratio restarts after each approved payout.

For each cycle, record:

1. Net profit since the previous approved payout, or the start of the funded stage.
2. Number of days reaching at least $200 profit.
3. Largest profitable day divided by net cycle profit.
4. Current balance minus $52,100.
5. Whether the first-request $2,000 cap or later $2,500 cap applies.

The balance-minus-buffer result is only a raw withdrawal ceiling. The other conditions, account standing, verification and the dashboard's request minimum still matter. Three $200 days generate $600 before other results, but they do not by themselves create withdrawable money above a fresh account's $52,100 buffer.

Cycle one: distinguish earned profit from withdrawable profit

Start with a new simulated funded $50K account. Assume the following net results, already after trading costs:

The balance is $55,000. The largest day is $1,800, so the ratio is 36%. The cycle goal and three-day count are satisfied. Money above the retained buffer is $55,000 − $52,100 = $2,900, but the first-payout cap reduces the raw request ceiling to $2,000.

Suppose the trader chooses a $1,900 account deduction instead of the maximum. The post-deduction balance would be $53,100, leaving $1,000 above the retained buffer. If $1,900 is a gross payout amount subject to the 90/10 split, the trader share would be $1,710. Check the dashboard's precise gross-versus-net request presentation rather than assuming the amount deducted and the amount received are identical.

The unrequested profit does not disappear. It remains relevant to the current balance, but it does not become fresh trading profit for the next cycle merely because the day counter restarts.

Cycle two: retained balance is not new cycle profit

After that approved payout, start the next ledger from $53,100. Assume three new net days of $300, $250 and $250. New cycle profit is $800, and the best-day ratio is 37.5%. The account balance is now $53,900.

The later payout cap is $2,500, but balance above the buffer is only $1,800. In this cycle, the buffer rather than the cap is the tighter numerical limit. The raw ceiling is therefore $1,800 before all other request conditions.

A hypothetical $1,500 account deduction would leave $52,400, only $300 above the retained buffer. The request can be smaller than the raw ceiling. Leaving additional profit is a deliberate balance-management choice; it does not change the firm's official minimum buffer.

This example also explains why comparing only the two payout caps is incomplete. A move from a $2,000 first cap to a $2,500 later cap increases the possible ceiling, but it creates no new account profit and guarantees no larger second payout.

Cycle three: the $500 goal can be met while two other checks fail

Now begin from the illustrative $52,400 post-request balance. Four sessions generate $300, $200, −$150 and $150. Net cycle profit is $500, matching the stated cycle goal. However, only two days reached $200, and the largest day accounts for 60% of the cycle profit.

The presence of $800 above the buffer does not solve the day-count or consistency problem. A later $275 net day would raise cycle profit to $775, create the third qualifying day, and reduce the ratio to 38.71%. The balance would then be $53,175, with $1,075 above the buffer.

Even here, the decision is not “withdraw everything available.” A $1,000 account deduction would leave only $75 above the retained buffer. A small subsequent loss could erase payout headroom for the next request even while the account remained above its separate hard-loss floor.

Payout buffer and hard-loss floor are different figures

Prime uses EOD trailing drawdown. The official plan guide describes the hard floor locking at starting balance once the trail has completed. The $52,100 payout buffer is a separate retained-balance condition, not a claim that the hard breach floor is always $52,100.

For example, if the dashboard shows a locked $50,000 hard floor and a $52,400 current balance, the account has $2,400 above that displayed floor but only $300 above the payout buffer. Those figures answer different questions: how much distance remains before the hard boundary, and how much profit sits above the withdrawal threshold.

Always use the actual displayed floor and avoid treating an EOD calculation as permission to disregard losses during the session. For the broader distinction, read the drawdown comparison.

Do not carry yesterday's contract ceiling forward blindly

The Prime guide describes funded contract scaling from account profit, updated at session end. Its maximum-size ladder must also be read alongside the purchased Included or Max ceiling. A withdrawal can change retained profit, so inspect the next session's displayed limit rather than using the largest number shown anywhere on the plan page.

This is especially important when a request leaves little payout headroom. A larger permitted size is not additional loss protection, and reaching a payout milestone does not make a higher-risk next session necessary.

How to redeem COMPARE and keep the records useful

1. Select Prime $50K and choose Included or Prime Max.
2. Confirm the regular monthly fee and billing terms.
3. Enter COMPARE and inspect the listed 30% initial reduction.
4. Compare the covered payment with $125.30 or $142.80, respectively.
5. Save the account agreement and check the next billing amount separately.
6. Once funded, restart the cycle ledger only after an approved payout and reconcile the actual account deduction.

The FFF firm page provides broader context. The repeat-purchase and renewal guide covers later fee uncertainty; the plan-specific coupon table covers other purchase configurations. For withdrawal terminology, use the payout-math explainer.

A complete request check uses the live balance, fresh cycle result, qualifying days, largest day and cap together. No single green number substitutes for the full set of conditions.