FundingPips Personal EA Evidence + Coupon Code AUDIT

Quick answer: FundingPips distinguishes personally developed EAs from third-party trading robots. Its conduct policy allows full automation with a personal EA when ownership can be demonstrated; possessing a compiled file alone is not enough. This guide explains how to organise a truthful development record without confusing purchase receipts with authorship.

Verified code: AUDIT. Discount: 10% off all FundingPips accounts. This is the current offer, replacing the older 20% rate. See the FundingPips coupon page.

Code: AUDIT

Official facts checked 6 October 2026. Affiliate disclosure: we may earn commission through site links. These are simulated programs; software permission does not guarantee passing or rewards.

Read the personal-EA exception precisely

The official conduct policy permits personally developed EAs with ownership evidence assessed by its team. Examples include source files, development history and an explanation of the logic. Third-party EAs are generally limited to trade or risk management. Its 1K Instant exception allows third-party automation, while the monthly competition prohibits EAs.

A product licence proves permission to use someone else's software, not that you developed it. Likewise, changing a filename or a few inputs does not establish personal authorship. If your project includes commissioned work, purchased components or shared development, explain that accurately and seek a decision before relying on the exception.

Create a development record that tells a coherent story

Start with the software you actually use, then work backward through its development. Identify the version, the source files from which it was built and the decisions that produced the current behaviour. A small honest record is better than a large collection of unrelated screenshots.

These are suggested organisational categories. They are not additional mandatory FundingPips submissions. Keep the record private until the official review process asks for relevant material. Remove unrelated secrets from anything you submit, and use the firm's authorised channel.

Explain one trade from signal to exit

A useful rehearsal is to describe one hypothetical trade in plain language. What information causes the program to consider an entry? What invalidates the setup? How is size calculated? What limits stop another order? How does an exit occur?

Suppose the program watches a moving-average relationship but also has a spread filter and a daily stop. An explanation that mentions only the moving averages leaves out the controls that govern actual execution. Write down the order in which the conditions are evaluated and what happens when two conditions conflict.

The goal is accuracy, not an impressive technical presentation. If you do not understand a module, say so. That gap is relevant to whether you can truthfully describe the EA as your own development. Do not manufacture old development history or claim to have written code that came from a vendor.

Match the running version to the reviewed version

Software changes after testing. An updated risk calculation, new entry filter or different execution module can make a previously saved explanation incomplete. Keep a simple version label in your private records and record material changes before using the update.

For example, version A may place one order at a time while version B introduces multiple entries. Even if the signal is unchanged, the risk behaviour is different. Review the new behaviour against the selected account rules instead of assuming that the earlier explanation covers it.

A practical release note needs only the change, its purpose and the checks performed. It should distinguish observed test results from expectations. A backtest or demo run cannot guarantee identical future execution, particularly when spreads, order handling or platform conditions differ.

Coupon calculation and the current price limitation

Current model-and-size purchase fees could not be reliably retrieved from the official storefront during this check. No account-specific numerical final price is therefore quoted. The verified AUDIT discount is 10%, and the calculation is straightforward once the official regular fee is known.

Do not apply the formula to simulated account capital. A $50K account label does not mean the program fee is $50,000. Also keep reset offers, paid options, currency conversion and other separate costs outside the calculation unless their coverage is expressly established. The existing FundingPips purchase guide uses the current rate despite its historical URL.

The official getting-started guide distinguishes model availability and trading commissions from the purchase fee. For standard evaluation models, it lists Forex and metals commissions separately. Those ongoing trading costs are not a second application of AUDIT.

Keep account rules beside the software record

EA ownership is one question; trading conduct is another. A documented personal project still needs to fit the selected account's loss limits, execution restrictions and reward requirements. Read the FundingPips firm review alongside the current model guide rather than treating automation permission as a blanket exemption.

Maintain two checklists: one for software provenance and one for account behaviour. The first asks who developed the system and which version is running. The second asks whether its actual orders comply with the chosen program. Keeping them separate makes it easier to identify a problem before it becomes an account dispute.

Apply AUDIT after resolving the software question

1. Select the account model and read its current automation policy.
2. Identify whether your software is personal development or third-party software.
3. Ask official support about any unclear ownership or model exception.
4. Select the available size and platform on the official purchase page.
5. Enter AUDIT before payment for the 10% account discount.
6. Save the order terms and maintain an accurate record of subsequent software changes.

A coupon can lower entry cost. It cannot turn an undocumented downloaded robot into personally developed software, and it cannot substitute for the firm's decision on an unclear case.